email@example.com wrote: > For one thing, there are DAC's inside a CD-player and they need bits to make > a sample. And this information does not match with yours saying you put some > bit patterns on a CD and they don't come out exactly as expected. My first > gues would be they would not come out at all as expected. But they partly do > so: confusion :( > > If I got you right, in case of the 101000 bitstream you wanted to end up with > a wave-pattern which should look as similar as the bitpattern itself. But it > doesn't. My idea: what about recording some known "music"-bitpatterns and > then to look on the CD hoe the real bit pattern looks like? Well, I used cdrecord, which can accept a raw binary stream of 'music'. I'm quite sure that I recorded said disk in the right way :) Furthermore, it's not that this mess is completely unexpected.. > Another idea: whabout only using the 22 and 11 KHz-signal? 22 KHz = 0 and 11 > KHZ = 1. Well, I haven't found time to complete my interface last weekend, but I think that the whole idea is still possible. Maybe not at 4 kb/s, but most definately at 2.2 kb/s -- Martijn van Buul - Pino@dohd.cx - http://www.stack.nl/~martijnb/ Visit OuterSpace: mud.stack.nl 3333 finger firstname.lastname@example.org for my public key block - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail email@example.com.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.