g.j.p.a.a.baltissen@kader.hobby.nl wrote:
> For one thing, there are DAC's inside a CD-player and they need bits to make
> a sample. And this information does not match with yours saying you put some
> bit patterns on a CD and they don't come out exactly as expected. My first
> gues would be they would not come out at all as expected. But they partly do
> so: confusion :(
>
> If I got you right, in case of the 101000 bitstream you wanted to end up with
> a wave-pattern which should look as similar as the bitpattern itself. But it
> doesn't. My idea: what about recording some known "music"-bitpatterns and
> then to look on the CD hoe the real bit pattern looks like?
Well, I used cdrecord, which can accept a raw binary stream of 'music'. I'm
quite sure that I recorded said disk in the right way :)
Furthermore, it's not that this mess is completely unexpected..
> Another idea: whabout only using the 22 and 11 KHz-signal? 22 KHz = 0 and 11
> KHZ = 1.
Well, I haven't found time to complete my interface last weekend, but I think
that the whole idea is still possible. Maybe not at 4 kb/s, but most
definately at 2.2 kb/s
--
Martijn van Buul - Pino@dohd.cx - http://www.stack.nl/~martijnb/
Visit OuterSpace: mud.stack.nl 3333
finger martijnb@stack.nl for my public key block
-
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tcm.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.