RE: 6510 CPU extensions - RAMs

From: Rainer Buchty (
Date: 2002-05-02 12:40:22

  • Next message: Gideon Zweijtzer: "RE: 6510 CPU extensions - RAMs"
    > Hmmm, wait a minute..... Not a good idea afterall: this would mean that the
    > SDRAM is occupied at least 50% of the time only because the VIC needs to
    > read data. (or can you circumvent this, Gideon ???)
    Since the VIC does only need 8 bit data being fetched/present during that
    time, why not wasting 8 (internal) flipflops on them... That way the SDRAM
    would only be occupied the minimum possible time where VIC can be as slow
    as it wants to.
    Rainer Buchty, LRR, Technical University of Munich
    Phone: +49 89 289-28401, Fax +49 89 289-28232, Room S3240
           Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

    Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.