RE: 6510 CPU extensions - RAMs

From: Rainer Buchty (buchty_at_cs.tum.edu)
Date: 2002-05-02 12:40:22

  • Next message: Gideon Zweijtzer: "RE: 6510 CPU extensions - RAMs"
    > Hmmm, wait a minute..... Not a good idea afterall: this would mean that the
    > SDRAM is occupied at least 50% of the time only because the VIC needs to
    > read data. (or can you circumvent this, Gideon ???)
    
    Since the VIC does only need 8 bit data being fetched/present during that
    time, why not wasting 8 (internal) flipflops on them... That way the SDRAM
    would only be occupied the minimum possible time where VIC can be as slow
    as it wants to.
    
    Rainer
    
    -- 
    
    Rainer Buchty, LRR, Technical University of Munich
    Phone: +49 89 289-28401, Fax +49 89 289-28232, Room S3240
    
    
           Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
    

    Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.