----- Original Message ----- From: "Spiro Trikaliotis" <Trikemail@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PM Subject: Re: What is better for a VIC 20... > the 1540 is the same as an early 1541 but with a different Firmware. > So, reparing it is the same as reparing a 1541. The guy told that the VC 1540 made a light blue smoke and that his circuit breaker opened: so, I think it is a problem with the power supply... > And: Yes, these "speedup-commands" are not needed - in fact, they > aren't even present! Anyway, these are not needed with a 1541, either. > You can, but you don't need to with the 1541. But, a 1541 connected to a VIC 20, if used without those commands, isn't slower than a 1540? ____ / ___|____ Daniele Gratteri, Italian Commodore and Amiga user / / | | |___/ E-MAIL: email@example.com / / | |___|___\ URL: http://utenti.tripod.it/danielegratteri \ \/ / \____| IRC: FIAT1100D - ICQ: 53943994 \/\/ Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.