Re: What is better for a VIC 20...

From: Daniele Gratteri (daniele_gratteri_at_inwind.it)
Date: 2002-01-21 18:46:11

----- Original Message -----
From: "Spiro Trikaliotis" <Trik-news@gmx.de>
To: <cbm-hackers@cling.gu.se>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: What is better for a VIC 20...


> the 1540 is the same as an early 1541 but with a different Firmware.
> So, reparing it is the same as reparing a 1541.

The guy told that the VC 1540 made a light blue smoke and that his circuit
breaker opened: so, I think it is a problem with the power supply...

> And: Yes,  these "speedup-commands" are not needed - in fact, they
> aren't even present! Anyway, these are not needed with a 1541, either.
> You can, but you don't need to with the 1541.

But, a 1541 connected to a VIC 20, if used without those commands, isn't
slower than a 1540?
  ____
 / ___|____   Daniele Gratteri, Italian Commodore and Amiga user  / /
| |   |___/   E-MAIL: daniele_gratteri@inwind.it                 / /
| |___|___\   URL: http://utenti.tripod.it/danielegratteri   \ \/ /
 \____|       IRC: FIAT1100D - ICQ: 53943994                  \/\/


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.