On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Nicolas Welte wrote: > So a 'clean' double clock is not achievable because of the refresh > cycles. Not on the C128 either. It'll switch the processor to single clock for the 5 refresh cycles. Since the TED only has 57 single cycles per line as opposed to the 63 or 65 of the VIC-IIe, the refresh cycles are a real nuisance when writing copper effects for double clock mode. Levente once sent me a nice DYCP copper scroller that had broader "pixels" (generated by changing the background color) near the right border. > But a clean single clock mode can be achieved by using the appropriate > control bit. Is this correct so far? Yes. Nothing contradictory to my experience so far. Marko - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail email@example.com.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.