From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-02-07 13:10:15
On Thursday 06 February 2003 07:28, Baltissen, R (Ruud) wrote:
> Hallo Groepaz,
>
> > however, the idea with the capacitors is even better :)
>
> Why, if I may ask? The capacitors don't improve anything and just add a
> frequency-dependant resistor to the circuit.
well... the capacitor serves as a decoupling device.... in "real" circuits you
will ALWAYS see a capacitor here (or a tranformer for more expensive things).
as for the c64, i would personally always use them, since they keep away any
static voltage from the valueable device :)
btw "frequency dependant" .... no, you would choose a capacitor whose capacity
is small enough to not interfere in this respect.
--
___ ___ .___________________ .___________ _______.
c=64 / | \| \__ ___/ \ \_ _____/ \ \ [groepaz]
gb / ' \ | | | / \ / \ | __)_ / | \ gp32
cgb \ . / | | |/ ' \| \/ | \ psx
gba \___|_ /|___| |____|\____|__ /_______ /\____|__ / dc
-----\/-----'---------------\/--------\/---------\/
http://www.hitmen-console.org Hitmen WWW Headquarters
http://fly.to/hitmen-groepaz my personal playground
http://rr.c64.org/silversurfer home of the RR debugger
ftp.musoftware.de/pub/groepaz cc65 dump site
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.6.