RE: 6522 vs 6526 (was Re: 6502 to 8501: new details)

ruud.baltissen_at_abp.nl
Date: 2002-02-28 10:28:04

Previous message: Nicolas Welte: "Re: 6523 vs 6525"
Maybe in reply to: Ethan Dicks: "6522 vs 6526 (was Re: 6502 to 8501: new details)"
Next in thread: Nicolas Welte: "Re: 6502 to 8501: new details"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hallo Spiro,

> It might be that real chips "behave better" than this!).

Then it does :) My Quickbyte-II Eprommer is equiped with two 6821's. I own
at least two IEEE-interfaces equiped with the 6821 as well.
    ___
   / __|__
  / /  |_/     Groetjes, Ruud
  \ \__|_\
   \___|       http://Ruud.C64.org

 

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Previous message: Nicolas Welte: "Re: 6523 vs 6525"
Maybe in reply to: Ethan Dicks: "6522 vs 6526 (was Re: 6502 to 8501: new details)"
Next in thread: Nicolas Welte: "Re: 6502 to 8501: new details"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.