> I'll try encapsulating them in a package and see if that makes the
> syntax checker happy, but if that was your intent shouldn't you have
> included a port mapping?
Only when I instantiate the design from the outside, e.g. from "c64.vhd",
there I obviously need the port mapping ... The packaging turns the
inbound component description into a "black box" to be imported into other
designs.
> I wasn't quibbling with the way you were doing it, just trying to
> figure out how you meant to express it.
As I stated in my previous mail: I expressed it wrongly... Need to chop
the process into two, one clocked by rising'edge, one by falling'edge (or
clock'event and clock='0/1' to be more portable).
> That's your first real mistake ;)
Assuming that people read the REC register documentation before? :)
Rainer
--
Rainer Buchty, LRR, Technical University of Munich
Phone: +49 89 289-28401, Fax +49 89 289-28232, Room S3240
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.