RE: Attachments
Date: 2001-08-03 12:01:44

>On discussion forums such as mailing lists and newsgroup, I prefer links
>to attachments for various reasons, including:
>As far as I know, there are free home page hosting services that you could
>use for storing documents you want to distribute to the cbm-hackers
>audience.  One of the first ones was GeoCities.
>I once read an article about the fact that Geocities and Yahoo claim
>material hosted by them as their property ie. they were allowed to use it

Hi all,
my intention was not to start a discussion about hosting options, but rather
whether there was a change in policy since the new CBM-Hackers thread
started. No problem if there's not.

However, it would seems a shame to loose the links to schemetics etc which
are pointed to as part of expressing an idea.... especially as we are now
fortunate to have the thread archived at

Is it possible to have a sub dir on funet similar to "incomming" for
"CBM-hacking" where we can upload and point to now and in the future?

- Nick


The contents of this email (including any attachments) may be
privileged and confidential. Any unauthorised use of the contents
is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
please advise us immediately (you can contact us by telephone
on +61 8 9441 2311 by reverse charge) and then permanently
delete this email together with any attachments. We appreciate
your co-operation.

Whilst Orbital endeavours to take reasonable care to ensure
that this email and any attachments are free from viruses or other
defects, Orbital does not represent or warrant that such is explicitly
the case

(C) 2000: Orbital Engine Company (Australia) PTY LTD and its

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.