Re: jeri's board - memory

From: Professor Dredd (
Date: 2001-03-13 12:38:05

Hiya Nate!

--- Nate Dannenberg <> wrote:
> > If Jeri will include a 65816 option in the board,
> it will make things
> > easier for programmers who depend on the '816. I'm
> hoping she will try
> > it :-)
> The more I think about it, the less enticing a 65816
> option seems to me,
> of course I have a Super CPU :-)

Umm, I did say OPTION. So, I suppose, the emulated
6510 would still be the controlling CPU unless a 65816
was plugged into the socket designated for it.

I like your idea of the card restricting its function
to that of a video controller when a SuperCPU is
present. I don't have any idea how that could be done
though. Too many unknowns about how the SuperCPU ties
itself to the system.

Get a FREE 6Mb webmail box from go6502! -

As low as 2.99% Intro APR from NextCard! -

PayPal is the FAST FREE and SECURE way to send money! -

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.