On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 email@example.com wrote: > Hi Jeri, > > I'd stick with the base 65x02.... Especially because the lower outlay cost > will make a cheaper product all-round. > > One question though, how were you intending to cope with the additional > memory mapping for the "up to 16Mb SDRAM" option? If this is via register > set, it would be great if the tech info was available to we can standardise > the access method. > What's the resolution? Even at 640x480, 16 bit, that's a SERIOUS chunk of video memory. How's our lowly 8bitta gonna hack this? - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.