Martijn van Buul wrote: > > email@example.com wrote: > > I highly encourage you to use the vic-20's IEC routines. The PETs dont > > suffer the timing issues the c64 and c128 do, and thus can benefit from > > the vic20's noticeably faster routines. > > That's why I opted for the VIC-20 routines in the first place. However, > Ruud has a point here: The C64-kernal is available in source, the VIC-20 > one isn't, AFAIK. I wonder if there is a difference between VIC-20 and C64 routines at all, apart from obvious changes due to different I/O setups and clock speed. The slowdown in timing is in the 1541, I thought after switching off the screen on the C64 and putting it the 1541 into 1540 mode it is as fast as with the VIC-20. Nicolas - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.