Re: Did Commodore cheat with the quad density floppies?

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:58:51 +0100
Message-Id: <AE1FF56A-B27D-4A7A-924B-CC0EFB9897A1@wfmh.org.pl>
> On 2019-01-09, at 14:09, smf <smf@null.net> wrote:
> 
>> That would be a day and hands saver more than once, but even if the drives had jumpers, which became rare with time (as a result of the original design choice), I don't see how this would work. You could theoretically swap _DS2(1) with _DS3(2) but you'd also have to swap _MTR with _DS1(0) to have a working conf again.
>> 
> This is for 3.5" disks, but google showed this forum post
> 
> http://www.vcfed.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-43518.html
> A Floppy such as the Teac FD-235F, HF - 3XXX Series has such options.
> 
> Another Possible JUMPER that is TYPICAL for Floppy Drives is one labeled MO or MS.
> MO is "Spindle Motor Controlled by Motor On Signal, which is Pin 16".
> MS is "Spindle Motor Controlled by Drive Select Signal, which could be One of four possibilities".
> 
> Another possibility is a HM Jumper.
> HM is "Head Load with Motor ON".

OK but I am still unsure how this can help swapping the logical ID unless you have two drives of the same type (which is where it mostly doesn't matter) or at least with similar capabilities and even then that's not clear to me. And since the signals were expected to be separated on the PC side, if I use one DS line to control Motor, will the appropriate DS still act as such? Or if it's performing dual function, then will the PC cope with that, while expecting both to be separated. Yeah... 

-- 
SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/
Received on 2019-01-09 19:00:03

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.