Re: Did Commodore cheat with the quad density floppies?

From: Mike Stein <mhs.stein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 15:57:28 -0500
Message-ID: <625207FAA3D14CF18779D1AEE4642659@310e2>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>
To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2019 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: Did Commodore cheat with the quad density floppies?



> On 2019-01-08, at 22:18, smf <smf@null.net> wrote:
> 
>> If you really wanted to and didn't mind running the motors concurrently, it was a simple enough mod to one of the drives to let you do what you insist is the "better way", i.e. selecting drives with the DS jumpers instead of position.
> 
> If the drives had DS jumpers then you just switch them both (i.e. if they were both jumpered DS1, then jumper both DS0).
> 
> The drives would then look at the other select line, which would have the effect of swapping the drive letter.

That would be a day and hands saver more than once, but even if the drives had jumpers, which became rare with time (as a result of the original design choice), I don't see how this would work. You could theoretically swap _DS2(1) with _DS3(2) but you'd also have to swap _MTR with _DS1(0) to have a working conf again.
--------------
No need to swap; just add a jumper between DS0 and HM, pins 2 and 8 on the jumper block of the TM-100s of the day.
Received on 2019-01-09 23:00:08

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.