Re: Did Commodore cheat with the quad density floppies?

From: André Fachat <afachat_at_gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:41:11 +0100
Message-ID: <1682fd761d8.27ff.b4d1f2b66006003a6acd9b1a7b71c3b1@gmx.de>
Am 8. Januar 2019 23:08:17 schrieb Mia Magnusson <mia@plea.se>:

> Den Tue, 8 Jan 2019 21:58:39 +0000 skrev smf <smf@null.net>:
>> On 08/01/2019 21:32, Thom Cherryhomes wrote:
>>> I do want to seriously bitch-slap IBM for doing such a horrible job
>>> on the CGA card (no dual ported memory... _FOR A CARD THAT COST
>>> HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS BY ITSELF_ )
>>
>> I think you underestimate how much 16k of ram cost them in 1981.
>>
>> Was dual ported memory even available back then?
>
> Dual ported memory is an expensive solution to what's usually an
> incorrectly formulated problem.
>
> The solution would be to use fast enough memories to be able to do as
> in 8-bit computers.

"Fast enough" would probably have been too expensive. Banking i.e. 
increasing memory bus width as with the 8032 could have been a solution.

André
>
Received on 2019-01-09 01:01:55

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.