> On 2018-07-04, at 23:40, Jim Brain <brain@jbrain.com> wrote: > >> https://github.com/Project-64/reloaded/blob/master/1520/extraction/main.c#L169 >> >> for(i = 0; i< sizeof(code);i++) { >> send_data(0xA9); >> send_data(code[i]); >> send_data(0x85); >> send_data(0x00 + i); >> TEST_OFF(); >> send_data(0); // extra cycle >> TEST_ON(); >> } >> >> Now, I didn't re-read the threads, so it is possible it was mentioned in >> there, and isn't an unclear thing at all, but isn't that clearly the >> cycle in which the STA (85) opcode must access the zero page to store >> the value there? > It is. I reread the posting and mentally made a note to update SIlverDream, but have not done so. Please do :-) Or should we just drop that paragraph and maybe add some comment in the extraction source? -- SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/Received on 2018-07-08 15:00:04
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.