Re: 6500/1 ROM Archival

From: Jim Brain <brain_at_jbrain.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 16:40:38 -0500
Message-ID: <2a083fb3-6e7b-fd32-f32d-11a79ebc5754@jbrain.com>
On 7/4/2018 2:39 PM, Rhialto wrote:
>
> https://github.com/Project-64/reloaded/blob/master/1520/extraction/main.c#L169
>
>      for(i = 0; i< sizeof(code);i++) {
> 	send_data(0xA9);
> 	send_data(code[i]);
> 	send_data(0x85);
> 	send_data(0x00 + i);
> 	TEST_OFF();
> 	send_data(0);  // extra cycle
> 	TEST_ON();
>      }
>
> Now, I didn't re-read the threads, so it is possible it was mentioned in
> there, and isn't an unclear thing at all, but isn't that clearly the
> cycle in which the STA (85) opcode must access the zero page to store
> the value there?
It is.  I reread the posting and mentally made a note to update 
SIlverDream, but have not done so.

Jim
Received on 2018-07-05 00:02:04

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.