Den Fri, 23 Feb 2018 22:52:06 +0000 skrev smf <smf@null.net>: > On 23/02/2018 20:08, Michał Pleban wrote: > > Sure, but the board for 6510 would have to be much more > > complicated, and I am still not sure if tapping some signals from > > the motherboard wouldn't be necessary. I am not sure if this would > > be worth the effort. > > Probably not. How about > http://westerndesigncenter.com/wdc/w65c816s-chip.cfm ? I assume that everyone have had 65816 in their minds while discussing a 6509 replacement. An interesting question though is how to handle that both 6509 and 65816 provide more than 16 adress lines. Some kind of mux to select 6509- or 65816-mode of addressing more than 64k? -- (\_/) Copy the bunny to your mails to help (O.o) him achieve world domination. (> <) Come join the dark side. /_|_\ We have cookies. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2018-02-24 00:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.