The originals are every bit that faint. That's why I didn't do ANY image processing on them whatsoever -- almost anything I tried only made it worse. Of course, advice or suggestions are always welcome -- I kept all the original images for this stuff. - Bo On 2/22/2018 12:12 AM, William Levak wrote: > > I have a document that I got somewhere on the internet that is almost > the same. In fact, it is identical except for pages 1, 2, 3, 7, 16, > 17, 29, 30, 41, 53, 65, and 66. > > Pages 67-71 are too faint to read. Are the originals that faint, or > did they just not scan well? > > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, Bo Zimmerman wrote: > >> For you 264 series fans, this was scanned from some stuff I received >> with the V364 back in the day, this appears to be from Dave Haynie >> and Bil Herd. >> >> http://www.zimmers.net/anonftp/pub/cbm/schematics/computers/plus4/264_Hardware_Spec.pdf >> >> >> >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >> > > wlevak@sdf.lonestar.org > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2018-02-22 23:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.