> On 2017-11-05, at 18:05, smf <smf@null.net> wrote: > > On 05/11/2017 15:58, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: >> IMHO it could have had a huge impact, had it come right after the NTSC version. Like a year or two max. >> > I'm not entirely why it was hard to do really. Wasn't it a framebuffer and two input mixer that used copper lists / amiga bitplanes to control how they were mixed? I can't tell either. My wild guess is that the guys got a bit overwhelmed with the success, while at the same time they completely lacked resources experienced in other than NTSC workflows. So the path of least resistance was to develop further the product for limited market, rather than making it all more difficult by entering uncharted territory. Lack of local testing sites might have played a role too. Just speculations. I never analysed the Toaster though. Got one recently (the "4000" variant) as a trade for a rare "GURU ROM" but wasn't able to even test it so far. -- SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/ Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-11-05 20:00:26
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.