> On 2017-09-02, at 01:48, Ingo Korb <email@example.com> wrote: > > firstname.lastname@example.org writes: > >> Interestingly I recall some of the equipment having the adjustments >> for chroma/luma relation in something as seemingly strange as 37ns >> steps. No idea where it came from. > > That's half of a pixel with the usual 13.5MHz BT.601 luma sampling > frequency or a quarter of a pixel for chroma. See? Man learns his whole life and dies dumb... Back then I used this for some good time (and it worked fine), having no idea why somebody chose that 37ns. Probably due to other inaccuracies it never came as obvious that I was shifting by half/quarter-pixels... Thank you for clearing the mystery, Ingo! -- SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/ Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-09-02 11:02:39
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.