Re: Difference in luma-chroma delay of C64/C128 compared to standard S-video

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:51:47 +0200
Message-Id: <D0E22B38-8D8E-4EEC-882D-053F94A2CA7A@wfmh.org.pl>
> On 2017-09-02, at 10:21, groepaz@gmx.net wrote:
> 
> Am Samstag, 2. September 2017, 03:54:33 CEST schrieben Sie:
>> But france also used the opposite polarity of the video signal compared
>> to most other countries, and they also used AM modulated audio on RF.
>> So the RF modulator must have been different.
> 
> wasnt it the other way around? ie SECAM used FM, the rest AM?

He's talking about France. SECAM uses FM modlulation for the chroma subcarriers (which was BTW giving us a lot of PITA back in the days), while the others use AM next to phase. What France used for broadcasting TV audio is beyond me but outside of France audio was F3E (aka FM) transmitted, either 6.5 or 5.5 MHz to the side of the video.
-- 
SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-09-02 11:02:11

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.