On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:19 PM, william degnan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Ethan Dicks <email@example.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:03 PM, william degnan <firstname.lastname@example.org> >> wrote: >> >>> So for now, I'm looking for other examples of bootable CP/M 3.0 Plus >> >>> disk images... Perhaps I should have been clearer that I meant "other examples of CP/M 3.0 Plus for the Commodore 128"... there are several images on zimmers.net. I am looking for versions not posted there so I can figure out what versions work and which do not. >> > Would Visual 1050 CP/M 3.0 Plus work for this? >> >> Tell me more about this. I know nothing about the Visual 1050. Having tracked down some links, it looks like some other brand of machine, not quite what I was looking for. To be clearer, I'm not trying to evaluate "CPM 3.0 Plus" on all platforms, just on the C-128. > I need to install at Quad/High Density drive onto my disk imaging station to > image the disk, or find a terminal program on the 1050 and copy to-from that > way. Could I just mail you a disk and you can return when you're done? Thanks for the offer, but I don't think it's going to help me solve my quandry. > I was under the impression that CBM CP/M > was nothing like any other, almost an emulated version. But where I got > that is "undocumented in my head" I'm not aware of it being emulated - there's a real Z80 in the C-128 (and the C-64 CP/M cartridge), but what is "odd" is that the native Commodore CPU participates in some of the I/O. They did not write IEC routines in Z-80 code as far as I can tell, and there is an underlying "6502 BIOS" that's part of Commodore CP/M. -ethan Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-23 05:00:07
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.