On 02/19/2017 02:09 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > >> On 2017-02-18, at 22:13, Gerrit Heitsch <email@example.com> wrote: >> >>> I remember how once I was happy to put my hands on a ceramic R1. And how I was disappointed once I placed it in the socket and used it for a little while. I "luv" the ceramic chips but in this case I went back to the newer revision pretty soon. >> >> The 6569R1 looks a bit off when you're used to the versions with 9 luma levels. You just have to find a 6569R3 in ceramic. I have 2 of them. :) > > Wanna trade one for something? ;-) Not really... I already traded a 6569R5 to get that second 6569R3 in ceramic. It lacks the labeling (looks like someone cleaned it too well), but since it works as a 6569 and the R1 can be detected by software, it has to be an R3. Gerrit Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-19 15:01:47
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.