Re: Is it at all possible?

From: Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 20:41:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFqpYu7avCy39BJESO2h6ow8bRuaV6G8_buEbvC0M0sfKc=MmQ@mail.gmail.com>
no problemo

i will keep an eye and ear out for a board of my own

2017-02-18 20:39 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>:

> I added head-on pics of the 326298 Rev A and C boards. Sadly, the back has
> a metal shield soldered onto both boards that will be difficult to remove
> and I'd like to keep these as working boards so front pics only.
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de
> > wrote:
>
>> On 02/18/2017 08:15 PM, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-02-18, at 09:36, smf <smf@null.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "The sweet spot is a 250466 board
>>>>
>>>
>>> Precisely…
>>>
>>> The VIC chip on those boards is a R5, which gives the clearest picture. "
>>>>
>>>
>> Not quite... You can get a clear picture from a 6569R1, 6569R3 or 6569R4
>> (that one is rather rare) as well. The problem on the older boards is
>> mostly the modulator. Replace it with a simple video amp and you will have
>> a very good picture. Ok, you lose the RF output, but who is using that
>> anymore?
>>
>>
>> It also has the 8 pin video port, not 5 pin like the earlier ones.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Which is also not fully correct. Should read "like some of the earlier
>>> ones". Not all earlier boards had 5-pin A/V socket.
>>>
>>
>> Even the old KU board already has the 8pin Video out.
>>
>>  Gerrit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>
>
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-02-18 20:03:55

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.