Re: Is it at all possible?

From: Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:39:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAO6+Cm64ws94dkdY78VxiWuaSR-ax2qgymWwiPCxBw2B_fPMmg@mail.gmail.com>
I added head-on pics of the 326298 Rev A and C boards. Sadly, the back has
a metal shield soldered onto both boards that will be difficult to remove
and I'd like to keep these as working boards so front pics only.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de>
wrote:

> On 02/18/2017 08:15 PM, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2017-02-18, at 09:36, smf <smf@null.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> "The sweet spot is a 250466 board
>>>
>>
>> Precisely…
>>
>> The VIC chip on those boards is a R5, which gives the clearest picture. "
>>>
>>
> Not quite... You can get a clear picture from a 6569R1, 6569R3 or 6569R4
> (that one is rather rare) as well. The problem on the older boards is
> mostly the modulator. Replace it with a simple video amp and you will have
> a very good picture. Ok, you lose the RF output, but who is using that
> anymore?
>
>
> It also has the 8 pin video port, not 5 pin like the earlier ones.
>>>
>>
>> Which is also not fully correct. Should read "like some of the earlier
>> ones". Not all earlier boards had 5-pin A/V socket.
>>
>
> Even the old KU board already has the 8pin Video out.
>
>  Gerrit
>
>
>
>
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-02-18 20:03:40

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.