Re: Is it at all possible?

From: Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:23:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFqpYu72piQZer7xn4n60-j7XKuFKsNV+6hQoFk1KxzF+VO17Q@mail.gmail.com>
nope that does not make sense either

so you are not the only one that dont get date vs rev

in the link i posted i can see rev C very faint at the bottom edge in the
middle

just under the component FB10 and next to C93

2017-02-17 23:20 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>:

> I'm not sure where to look.  Chip dates are:
>
> - 326298 Rev A - 6502 date: Week 48 82
> - 326298 Rev C - 6502 date: Week 29 82
>
> I still don't get Commodore dates vs revisions.
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Can you see any production dates on the Rev A and Rev C ?
>>
>> 2017-02-17 23:14 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Slight change to my last message.  I have two boards plus a couple of
>>> extra C64 Silver labels that I don't know what's inside at this point.
>>>
>>> The open ones have:
>>> - 326298 Rev A
>>> - 326298 Rev C
>>>
>>> That picture is a Rev C.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Bo Herrmannsen <
>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> would it be pushing it using a scanner for that?
>>>>
>>>> benefits are able to get better image...
>>>>
>>>> does the board look the same as this: http://myoldcomputer.nl/
>>>> wp-content/uploads/2015/11/board-326298.jpg
>>>>
>>>> but i need details arround RP4 and L4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-02-17 23:07 GMT+01:00 Santo Nucifora <santo.nucifora@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a C64 326298 board in front of me.  It's not for sale but I'm
>>>>> happy to take detailed pics if you need them.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Bo Herrmannsen <
>>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> also C48 and C93 is missing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-02-17 22:24 GMT+01:00 Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Ruud
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Found some errors in your schematic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> U31 pin 16 is missing
>>>>>>> C68 is missing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-02-17 21:37 GMT+01:00 Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Silver no problemo... its no rush. I'm still getting my head to
>>>>>>>> absorb the schematic from the Programmer's Reference Guide and schematic
>>>>>>>> #326106. There are a few differences allready between the 2 and so far i
>>>>>>>> have just put a circle arround them
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But so far RP4 and L4 is the mystery bits. L4 is just listed as a
>>>>>>>> line filter with no values at all or any mfg code. all i know is that its 2
>>>>>>>> inductors in one unit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> RP4 is a resistor pack with one common pin, but given its listed as
>>>>>>>> a 10 pin device there are 9 resistors inside, but i can only count 8 on the
>>>>>>>> schematic so i guess 1 is unused.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-02-17 21:23 GMT+01:00 <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > On 2017-02-17, at 20:55, Bo Herrmannsen <
>>>>>>>>> bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > @Silver
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > When you come by the 326298 please let me know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I wrote, I should have one somewhere. The keyword here is
>>>>>>>>> "somewhere". So I might have a quick look but if it's not easily found then
>>>>>>>>> I won't be able to dedicate enough time to dig it out. And - obviously - it
>>>>>>>>> won't be for sale but I might check a thing or two for you if needed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW. Some time ago I had a short discussion about VIC-20 boards
>>>>>>>>> here. I don't remember know exactly with whom but if the person who wanted
>>>>>>>>> me to check things on those boards reads the list - please come back with
>>>>>>>>> your question again. Seems that I managed to gather /I think/ all my
>>>>>>>>> VIC-20s under one roof so I can check whatever you wanted to check there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> SD!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-02-17 23:01:25

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.