Re: Is it at all possible?

@Silver

When you come by the 326298 please let me know.

Will try and compile at list of what i need to have checked

@anyone... let me know if there are a c64 for sale with the 326298 inside.
Initial it does not have to be in working order. I am after the bare board
first time arround

2017-02-17 19:42 GMT+01:00 <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>:

>
> > On 2017-02-17, at 18:12, Francesco Messineo <
> francesco.messineo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> As far as I know, the 326298 is older than the KU-14194HB.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> yes, but should be practically identical, not that I witnessed them in
> >>> real life, but I've never found any documented schematic change
> >>> between them.
> >>
> >>
> >> The layout is quite different, especially on the right side of the PCB:
> >>
> >> KU: http://myoldcomputer.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/KU-14194HB.jpg
> >>
> >> 326298: http://www.cbmhardware.de/c64/images/326298a.jpg
> >>
> >
> > you're so right!
>
> I am yet to find a single Gerrit's statements where he is not ;-)
>
> BTW - all the boards in one place are listed/shown on my ROM replacement
> page:
>
> http://e4aws.silverdr.com/projects/romrep/
>
> Except the Yeti... I mean the 250441... Has anyone seen that one?
>
> > I'm missing three revisions then (and both the two older ones won't be
> > coming as far as I can dream).
>
> I should have the 326298 somewhere but as for KU-board, well.. we are on
> the same boat.
>
> --
> SD!
>
>
>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list