> On 2017-02-17, at 18:12, Francesco Messineo <email@example.com> wrote: > >>>> >>>> >>>> As far as I know, the 326298 is older than the KU-14194HB. >>> >>> >>> yes, but should be practically identical, not that I witnessed them in >>> real life, but I've never found any documented schematic change >>> between them. >> >> >> The layout is quite different, especially on the right side of the PCB: >> >> KU: http://myoldcomputer.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/KU-14194HB.jpg >> >> 326298: http://www.cbmhardware.de/c64/images/326298a.jpg >> > > you're so right! I am yet to find a single Gerrit's statements where he is not ;-) BTW - all the boards in one place are listed/shown on my ROM replacement page: http://e4aws.silverdr.com/projects/romrep/ Except the Yeti... I mean the 250441... Has anyone seen that one? > I'm missing three revisions then (and both the two older ones won't be > coming as far as I can dream). I should have the 326298 somewhere but as for KU-board, well.. we are on the same boat. -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-17 19:02:49
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.