Re: cbm 8032 motherboard + 4164

From: Terry Raymond <traymond20_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:58:52 -0600
Message-ID: <CAEFCF-pgpNtfB5C0JudHD91Ut8t7CXLoVdKC7jtziB2ta2J2DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all,
Are the 41256 Ram that was used on C128 or way earlier?

Terry Raymond

On Wednesday, October 12, 2016, Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de>
wrote:

> On 10/12/2016 07:34 AM, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
>
>> Hi Ruud,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 05:15:44AM +0000, Baltissen, GJPAA (Ruud) wrote:
>>
>>> Hallo Gerrit,
>>>
>>>
>>> 41256 need 8Bit refresh...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nope. Otherwise the Finnish's and the 64'er's 256 KB hack on the C64
>>> wouldn't
>>> have worked.
>>>
>>
>> The VIC-II in the C64 (as well as the VIC-IIe in the C128) implements an
>> 8-bit refresh counter. That was proven in 1994 by the test program that
>> Andreas Boose wrote, to check which memory addresses the VIC-II chip is
>> reading.
>>
>
> There was no need to prove that... VIC (and TED) _has_ to supply an 8Bit
> refresh since the 64Kx4 DRAMs and some of the 4164 need it. If VIC was only
> doing 7Bit, Commodore would have been limited with the 4164 they could use
> and the 250466 and 250469 boards couldn't exist.
>
> So when replacing 4116 DRAMs with 4164, make sure what kind of refresh
> your system supplies. If you don't know, use 4164 that only need 7Bit
> refresh. To find out, grab the datasheet.
>
>  Gerrit
>
>
>
>
>
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2016-10-12 20:01:10

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.