Hello! Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > Having said this, I do not know how much the so-called Commodore IEEE > bus differs from the GPIB. Is it essentially the same? In this case, you > might be lucky with cbmctrl. It does not differ at all - it is essentially the same (only the connector in the PET is different). The problem is that GPIB defines only low-level communication details, a bit like TCP/IP. What you build on top of that, the application protocol, is up to you. So it's like two computers with a TCP/IP stack, but one speaks HTTP and one TELNET - even though the underlying low-level protocol (TCP/IP) is the same, it won't allow them to communicate unless they agree on the same higher level protocol. Regards, Michau. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2014-07-25 21:01:05
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.