On 2014-05-22 at 00:13:00, Groepaz (groepaz@gmx.net) wrote: > > INPUT 64 was IMHO the best electronic mag of the days. Even if all the > > money I ever earned on German market was coming from M&T and CP Verlag - I > > still felt that it was Heinz Heise who published the best mag. > > yes and no :) for tools and productivity stuff INPUT64 ruled - for games > magicdisk was a lot better :) Right. I always forget that there was something like “games” on the market.. ;-) For me it was a no-brainer as I’ve been always interested in tools / utils rather than games (unless we talk for cracking or we talk “Elite”). > > > /Input64_nib - nib images of the disks (4/85 - 12/88, incomplete) > > > 11/85 > > > 1/86 2/86 5/86 6/86 7/86 8/86 9/86 > you got that wrong... i have all the .tap images, missing are the mentioned > .nib (disks) files Were they at all protected? Or is it rather for the “full original” preservation purpose? > > > /Input64_pdf - scans of the papermag (1/85 - 12/88, incomplete) > > > > > > missing (11): > > > > > > 3/86 4/86 9/86 > > > 5/88 6/88 7/88 8/88 9/88 10/88 > > > > I have 6/88 7/88 8/88 original “Beihefte” if those are missing too. > > yes! scans would be awesome OK. -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2014-05-22 00:00:07
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.