Ok, my thought is the type of SIMM, I have some that don't work as predictably on some computers even though they are rated for such... I think the older ones have more problem on newer machines, (power consumption, etc) On IBMs SIMMs parity can be an issue as well, are they "non-parity"? "Dave R." wrote: > > Since the SCPU list is being a pain in the butt, I'll run this by you guys... > > *sigh* > > I bought two 72-pin SIMMs last week, one EDO, one fastpage, both 16mb 70ns. > Put the EDO (which is what it wants) in my Lexmark printer and it says it > only sees 8mb. Put the fastpage in there. Same thing. But I doubt you can > help me with that... > > I then put the fastpage in my SuperCPU. It boots up saying 16mb. Wheels > doesn't want to boot...("System Error near $04B5"). SuperRAMTest gets all > the way through the bit fill pattern test, but fails the block/page > addressing test immediately. Same story for the EDO, but that was to be > expected. > > All the chips in the SCPU are firmly set in their sockets, and there's > nothing else plugged into the 128 except my 1581. > > The chips both seem to work fine in my parents' PC. > > Is there something I might be missing here? > > Thanks, > Dave Ross -- 01000011 01001111 01001101 01001101 01001111 01000100 01001111 01010010 01000101 Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS (209) 754-1363 300-14.4k bps Classic Commodore pages at: http://www.jps.net/foxnhare/commodore.html 01000011 01001111 01001101 01010000 01010101 01010100 01000101 01010010 01010011 - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.