On 06/20/2013 09:56 AM, HÁRSFALVI Levente wrote: > Hi!, > > On 06/20/13 05:22, Jim Brain wrote: >> Not sure if others saw this, and I'm not a Graphics guru, but there's >> some technical details in the comments: >> >> http://csdb.dk/release/?id=115690 > > Absolutely brilliant investigation and explanation. Likely also applying > to the TED just as it is. Maybe, maybe not... TED doesn't produce multiplexed addresses but relies on the same multiplexers the CPU uses to access RAM. This does introduce a slight delay between address appearing at TED's address pins and the time the RAM sees them. _RAS is directly connected to the RAMs though. This delay might be all that's needed to avoid the crash. Gerrit Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2013-06-20 16:01:20
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.