From: "A. Fachat"; on Saturday, May 25, 2013; at 10:34 AM -0400 > > While writing a test case for our XD2031 firmware, I found a subtle > difference in DOS2.6's U1/2 parameter handling compared to DOS2.7's. > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/108561624393340605896/posts/Xw2AxRsTFAv > > Obviously, a > PRINT#1,"U2:",2,0,1,1 > statement works on only DOS2.7, and not on 2.6? > > Can you confirm that? DOS 2.7's command-line buffer is 17 bytes longer than DOS 2.6's buffer. [The docs. are wrong. Don't use commas or TAB() in PRINT# statements; unless, you openned a file on the screen device.] Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2013-05-26 00:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.