Subtle difference in CBM DOS

From: A. Fachat <>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 16:34:51 +0200
Message-ID: <2059386.PBoqGPKSXy@euler>
While writing a test case for our XD2031 firmware I found a subtle difference in 
DOS2.6's U1/2 parameter handling compared to DOS2.7's.

Obviously a 


only works on DOS2.7 but no on 2.6?

Can you confirm that?


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2013-05-25 15:00:07

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.