Re: SX-clocks (another one)

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 17:45:24 +0200
Message-Id: <F62E4A17-BEBD-4445-800B-AC9DEA3398AB@wfmh.org.pl>
On 2013-05-21, at 13:20, Michał Pleban wrote:

> The main problem here is that the change in TODTEN register can occur at
> any scanline number.

Right.

> So that's why I predict you might need to put more
> care into counting scanlines - they are not synchronized to the TOD
> clock in any way so you never know in what place of the screen you will
> start counting... That would also make your prediction harder.

I know - we are growing on mem usage here as I'll have to do some 9-bit arithmetic. This will be the biggest disadvantage vs. the original idea. Implementation of the latter is quite reasonably short.

-- 
SD!
       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2013-05-21 16:01:01

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.