Re: 6569 luminances

From: MikeS <>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:52:33 -0400
Message-ID: <F59358594BBB448E87B5771AB9A9723F@vl420mt>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MikeS" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: 6569 luminances

> Eh? Say what? AFAIK, with /CE low the time it takes to get valid data is
> tOE, e.g. 50ns vs. 200ns in a -200 'C256 (not that it matters at 1MHz).

Ah, sorry, I see what you meant, the delay from valid address to valid data; 
so, as you and I both say, /CE or /OE doesn't really make any difference, 

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2012-05-14 19:00:51

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.