Re: 6702 chip

From: William Levak <wlevak_at_SDF.ORG>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 07:42:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1205140726240.3842@sdf.lonestar.org>
On Sat, 12 May 2012, William Levak wrote:

I wrote a basic routine to calculate the expexted numbers and compare them 
to the ones actually produced by the 6702.  I ran this for several 
thousand write and read cycles.  They matched.  Then I modified the routine to 
write every even number for each 420 number cycle, 53760 cycles.  They all 
matched.

The value of the even number doesn't appear to matter, at least when the 
odd number is one.


The fact that both bits one and five toggle every three cycles indicates 
that they used existing 8 bit technology.  If they were designing a chip from 
scratch, they could easily have made one of the bits change every 9 
cycles.


> Starting number, 214
>
> 128 toggled every 2 numbers
> 64 toggled every 5 numbers
> 16 toggled every number
>  4 toggled every 7 numbers
>  2 toggled every 3 numbers
>  1 toggled every 6 numbers
>
> The pattern repeats every 420 numbers. (I neglected that 14 and 60 have a 
> common factor).
>
> Each operation affects only one bit, the whole chip would require 8 counting 
> circuits and perhaps a couple registers.  The output would require a latched 
> register.
>
> This is from writing 0, followed by 1. Now that I have a formula, I can test 
> what other numbers might do.

wlevak@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2012-05-14 08:00:23

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.