Re: 6809 / 6702 puzzle

From: Rhialto <rhialto_at_falu.nl>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:59:38 +0200
Message-ID: <20120430085938.GA26075@falu.nl>
On Mon 30 Apr 2012 at 04:39:58 +0000, William Levak wrote:
> 2)  A hardware chip of this size would have a response time of 50
> micrseconds, or less.  PEEKing and POKing from BASIC may not be fast
> enough to see all the output.

Possibly. But so far, the sequence that I read out with the Basic
program passes validation. Both by the C version of the validation
routine and the original one (running in VICE). (I've been lazy though
and haven't tried all values that I posted here, just the first set).

It would be interesting to see results from die shots from the
visual6502 people, but I have no idea how soon we can expect that. (Not
that I can read die shots but other people can..)

-Olaf.
-- 
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert  -- There's no point being grown-up if you 
\X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl    -- can't be childish sometimes. -The 4th Doctor

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2012-04-30 09:00:26

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.