Re: QLink Reloaded

James,

  Wow! Thanks for the info!

  I grabbed ShadowM's repository, and followed Mike's instructions for 
setting up the DB. I also followed his instructions as a test (compile 
in eclipse, same result on // issuance. export build.xml, compile with 
ant, same results again).

I know there's a bug with //who - but I can't get my server build to 
issue any // command without Vice / x64 bailing to a warm boot. (Yes, I 
am using an emulator. I don't have an RS-232 port for my 64, so Vice was 
the best option for me).

  Tod.

ps.

Sorry, I top-post. Feel free to yell, I can bottom-post as well.


On 4/15/2012 1:02 AM, James L. Mazurek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Jim Brain <brain@jbrain.com
> <mailto:brain@jbrain.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 4/10/2012 6:04 AM, Tod D. Ihde wrote:
>
>         Hi all!
>
>           Has anyone messed about with the QLink Reloaded server
>         software that ShadowM hosts at
>         http://www.lyonlabs.org/__commodore/qlink/index.html
>         <http://www.lyonlabs.org/commodore/qlink/index.html> ? (Other
>         than Jim Brain, the author, obviously).
>
>         I've been tinkering a bit, but I'm getting errors that differ
>         from the server that ShadowM runs at http://lyonlabs.org:5190 -
>         It seems any server I compile myself causes the client to bail
>         when any // command is issued in chat, whilst the original .jar
>         behaves much more sanely (except for //who - don't use that!). I
>         have tried building with eclipse, netbeans, and ant.
>
>         If anyone else would like to give it a go, I'd love to hear the
>         results.
>
>     I'm on a new machine, so it'll take me a while to set up the
>     build/test env again, but that does seems strange.    However, I
>     wonder ig you ask Java to compile for v5 or v4 if the situation
>     improves.
>
>     Jim
>
>
> It seems I had similar behavior when I ran the QLR server on a machine
> running Debian 5.0 (lenny) 32-bit with openjdk-6 from
> q-link.swrap.org:5190 <http://q-link.swrap.org:5190>
>
> However, I seem to recall ShadowM baiting me into issuing a //who
> command.  After much havoc and hilarity ensued ShadowM implied that
> there is a bug in the // commands //who being the worst offender.
>
> My current QLR test server that had been running at q-link.net:5190
> <http://q-link.net:5190> is also running Debian 5.0 but with
> sun-java-jdk-5.  I haven't seen any significant difference in the
> operation outside of perhaps performance.  Although, I didn't
> specifically test the chat // commands.  I assumed there is a bug that
> needed to be fixed.
>
> Jim, when you had mentioned to me that you were working on a chat system
> update I figured I would not monkey with it until you merged your
> patches in.
>
> For what it is worth I built my QLR server instances more or less
> following the docs in the svn repository (Mike's repository not
> ShadowM's) i.e. copy the source code tree, import into Eclipse, create
> the build.xml file, compile with ant and move files to more sane
> locations for a Debian GNU/Linux system.
>
> When I find some time I'll verify the chat command failures in the
> current instance.
>
> -Jim


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list