Re: QLink Reloaded

From: Tod D. Ihde <tihde_at_warmerbythelake.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:00:39 -0500
Message-ID: <4F8A6407.2070409@warmerbythelake.com>
Jim,

Right, so I set up another build environment. I installed Debian 5 on a 
VM with Sun JDK 6 (1.6.whatever), NetBeans, etc etc... compile, run... 
same response. (Before I had heard back from ShadowM, I thought perhaps 
I was using software that had introduced compatibility issues when it 
got upgraded, so I went for a 2+ year old environment).

I've set up a new, clean install of Debian 6 / Java 6 / NetBeans 7, so 
we'll see how that goes.

And thank you for taking the time - I didn't want to bug you about it, I 
figured you're pretty busy.

I shall now expose my ignorance: version 5 / version 4... Huh?

(As far as Java experience goes, I am only an egg).

  Thanks!

  Tod.

On 4/15/2012 12:09 AM, Jim Brain wrote:
> On 4/10/2012 6:04 AM, Tod D. Ihde wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Has anyone messed about with the QLink Reloaded server software that
>> ShadowM hosts at http://www.lyonlabs.org/commodore/qlink/index.html ?
>> (Other than Jim Brain, the author, obviously).
>>
>> I've been tinkering a bit, but I'm getting errors that differ from the
>> server that ShadowM runs at http://lyonlabs.org:5190 - It seems any
>> server I compile myself causes the client to bail when any // command
>> is issued in chat, whilst the original .jar behaves much more sanely
>> (except for //who - don't use that!). I have tried building with
>> eclipse, netbeans, and ant.
>>
>> If anyone else would like to give it a go, I'd love to hear the results.
> I'm on a new machine, so it'll take me a while to set up the build/test
> env again, but that does seems strange. However, I wonder ig you ask
> Java to compile for v5 or v4 if the situation improves.
>
> Jim
>
>
> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2012-04-15 07:00:14

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.