On 2012-02-13, at 16:58, Ruud@Baltissen.org wrote: > Hallo Patryk, > >> Hi Ruud! Wondering why not use the relatively well-thought and >> already implemented IDE64 CFS filesystem > > For several reasons: > - This is completely new for me. In the time I got my IDE64 it > wasn't free/explained. And I have asked for it! Really? I recall the info being available for as long as I recall IDE64. And both Josef and Soci were very helpful when I needed info for implementing my kernel module. So maybe there were some communication problems. > But most important: > it means I have to start from scratch on. I see, but I believe it would be worth trying as a) it is already implemented so possibly a lot could be reused b) it is well established, with tools, fsck, etc. c) it would be great to have compatibility and move media between your solution and IDE64 without problem d) any improvements, new tools or utilities could add value to both projects! Just my half of a cent ;-) -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-02-13 21:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.