On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:47 +0100, Groepaz wrote: > On Sonntag 31 Oktober 2010, you wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:57:27 -0700 > > I'd say 6 devices is reasonable, but if the amount of delay doesn't > > increase all that quickly with the number of devices you're willing to > > deal with, go for something that no one in the real world is likely to > > ever actually exceed - perhaps 8 or so. > > haha, i dont know but.... you and the other 2 people ..... > > personally i dont know anyone who - today - uses more than two drives (most > infact are moving away from even that to 1541u or similar). and especially for > a device like this, i think 4 would be more than enough. most probably wont > even use more than one =P +1, four is enough. -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) http://www.lyonlabs.org "The text is only a proposition." -Pierre Boulez Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2010-11-01 12:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.