From: André Fachat (afachat_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2008-12-06 13:21:00
I only have two implementations of FAT16, but not FAt32. They fit nicely into
6502 address space. IIRC about 8k or so
André
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:02:58 -0600
> Von: Jim Brain <brain@jbrain.com>
> An: cbm-hackers@ling.gu.se
> Betreff: Re: FAT32 Code in 6502 or 6809 assembly language?
> Rainer Buchty wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > before I start reinventing the wheel -- is anyone aware of a public
> > FAT32 implementation for 6502 or 6809 systems (6809 preferred) and
> > could point me there?
> >
> > After checking m6809-gcc's (even optimized) output there seems to be
> > no alternative to manual coding...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rainer
> >
> > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
> I would concur. I tried compiling FatFS, which I feel is the best low
> footprint FAT library out there, and it was 28K of 6502 code.
>
> I would look to it as you code up ML, though, as I think the code is
> very nice. I made a Long Filename variant of it called FatFS-LFN that
> we use in uIEC and sd2iec.
>
> Jim
>
>
> --
> Jim Brain, Brain Innovations (X)
> brain@jbrain.com
> Dabbling in WWW, Embedded Systems, Old CBM computers, and Good Times!
> Home: http://www.jbrain.com
>
>
> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.