From: André Fachat (afachat_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2008-12-06 13:21:00
I only have two implementations of FAT16, but not FAt32. They fit nicely into 6502 address space. IIRC about 8k or so André -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:02:58 -0600 > Von: Jim Brain <email@example.com> > An: firstname.lastname@example.org > Betreff: Re: FAT32 Code in 6502 or 6809 assembly language? > Rainer Buchty wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > before I start reinventing the wheel -- is anyone aware of a public > > FAT32 implementation for 6502 or 6809 systems (6809 preferred) and > > could point me there? > > > > After checking m6809-gcc's (even optimized) output there seems to be > > no alternative to manual coding... > > > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > I would concur. I tried compiling FatFS, which I feel is the best low > footprint FAT library out there, and it was 28K of 6502 code. > > I would look to it as you code up ML, though, as I think the code is > very nice. I made a Long Filename variant of it called FatFS-LFN that > we use in uIEC and sd2iec. > > Jim > > > -- > Jim Brain, Brain Innovations (X) > email@example.com > Dabbling in WWW, Embedded Systems, Old CBM computers, and Good Times! > Home: http://www.jbrain.com > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.