Re: VIC2 images

From: Sam Laur (
Date: 2008-05-18 14:01:29

Wolfgang Moser wrote:
> Micha, as already seen with the two sample image file
> from Friday there is again a small GAP between these
> two rows instead of an overlap. I was able to estimate
> to correct distance with the help of some cut out
> fragments.

I have no problems making composite rows, but indeed,
vertical merging is hard because there is no overlap.
I'm actually using a "panorama making" software intended
for stitching together digital camera pictures.
(The Panorama Factory, running pretty much on default
settings, and combining pictures automatically). Full rows
are about 30-40 MB each :)

Just did two rows at full resolution, and it takes maybe
five minutes per row to process, so it's not a big effort.
Merging the row images, on the other hand, will be a bit more

> By the way, such big overlays as with the horizontal
> ones may have a big advantage. Currently I'm using

Yes, I agree, a big overlap in this case is just a good thing.
The automatic combiner runs much better in this case as well.


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.