From: Sam Laur (slaur_at_utu.fi)
Date: 2008-05-18 14:01:29
Wolfgang Moser wrote:
> Micha, as already seen with the two sample image file
> from Friday there is again a small GAP between these
> two rows instead of an overlap. I was able to estimate
> to correct distance with the help of some cut out
> fragments.
I have no problems making composite rows, but indeed,
vertical merging is hard because there is no overlap.
I'm actually using a "panorama making" software intended
for stitching together digital camera pictures.
(The Panorama Factory, running pretty much on default
settings, and combining pictures automatically). Full rows
are about 30-40 MB each :)
Just did two rows at full resolution, and it takes maybe
five minutes per row to process, so it's not a big effort.
Merging the row images, on the other hand, will be a bit more
difficult...
> By the way, such big overlays as with the horizontal
> ones may have a big advantage. Currently I'm using
Yes, I agree, a big overlap in this case is just a good thing.
The automatic combiner runs much better in this case as well.
Sam
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.