Re: FAT32 way to go!

Antitrack_at_networld.at
Date: 2007-09-08 12:19:23

Next message: Antitrack_at_networld.at: "RE: Checking syntax for 1541 and more..."
Previous message: Antitrack_at_networld.at: "Re: Checking syntax for 1541 and more..."
In reply to: Pasi Ojala: "Re: RE: Checking syntax for 1541 and more..."
Next in thread: Rhialto: "Re: FAT32 way to go!"
Reply: Rhialto: "Re: FAT32 way to go!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Zitat von Pasi Ojala <albert@cs.tut.fi>:

> > I do have experience implementing FAT12/FAT16 on the CBM, although
> > it's been a while.
> 
> I have implemented read-only handling of FAT/FAT32 (partial FAT12 support).
> I has been highly optimized for code size.

Can you share your code? Would be great!!
Thnkxxxx

ATT



--------------------------------------
Ein Service von http://www.networld.at

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Next message: Antitrack_at_networld.at: "RE: Checking syntax for 1541 and more..."
Previous message: Antitrack_at_networld.at: "Re: Checking syntax for 1541 and more..."
In reply to: Pasi Ojala: "Re: RE: Checking syntax for 1541 and more..."
Next in thread: Rhialto: "Re: FAT32 way to go!"
Reply: Rhialto: "Re: FAT32 way to go!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.