Date: 2005-11-23 10:26:22
On 2005-11-23, at 02:38, Groepaz wrote: > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 02:11, Christopher Phillips wrote: >> On 23 Nov 2005, at 03:29, Anders Carlsson wrote: >>> I can understand the desire to be the best or fastest, but for >>> practical >>> use, does it matter if it takes 20, 25 or 30 seconds to convert a >>> floppy >>> to a disk image? >> >> Well, if it's part of your edit-compile-run cycle on final hardware >> testing of your demo, and the seconds are ticking away until the last >> moment in time you can submit your entry, it can certainly *seem* >> important ;) > > but for that, wouldnt you want to write a disc image to a floppy > and not the > other way around? :=P heh :-) Right. But the companion tool is planned too. And most of this discussion will apply to it as well :-P -- Nie twierdzę, że Windowsy są najlepsze, ale póki co nikt nic lepszego nie wymyślił. - from p.c.s.a. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.