From: Patrycjusz R. £ogiewa (silverdr_at_inet.com.pl)
Date: 2005-08-19 11:05:55
On 2005-08-19, at 03:08, Richard wrote: > > In article <CDFF9EE1-EBBC-415E-84CC-73D4BB456DC6@inet.com.pl>, > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?"Patrycjusz_R._=A3ogiewa"?= > <email@example.com> writes: > > >> Making the board wouldn't probably be that difficult as writing the >> firmware for it... [...] >> > > You miss the point. I don't have time to make boards. I was only adding to your lack of time to make the board - that you would need even much more time writing the firmware. The board could possibly be designed by several persons on this forum within two evenings but I think nobody would take on the task of quickly writing firmware for it. Therefore I wasn't saying "go and make the board" but rather "even if you had the time to make the board - you wouldn't get any use of it without the firmware". As Groepaz suggested: check C2N232 - it certainly won't be as fast as IDE64 but might be your best bet anyway. -- Software, n.: The parts of a computer system that can not be kicked. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.