From: Patrycjusz R. Łogiewa (silverdr_at_inet.com.pl)
Date: 2005-05-08 16:53:32
On 2005-05-08, at 14:51, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > > Ok, I had a look into both the probing routines of the 1541 drive and > the 1571 drive. You are right, they both do lousy jobs in spreading the > sectors over the track, thus, so much bytes are not unlikely. > > "Our" probing formatter is much better (and faster!) ;-) Just to clarify: I don't expect any credit for _your_ routines ;-) I was more referring to "us" as a community vs. "them" as the original CBM programmers. -- Democracy, n.: The triumph of popularity over principle. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.