From: MagerValp (MagerValp_at_panini.cling.gu.se)
Date: 2005-03-30 13:08:01
>>>>> "AF" == fachat <afachat@gmx.de> writes:
AF> If you are using o65, could you please answer these short
AF> questions?
Sure! I'm not sure how useful my answers are going to be though...
AF> 1) What are you using o65 for?
AF> E.g.: main executable format for system xyz, object file format
AF> for linking, ...
Executable format for a small DOS-like operating system. shell.exe is
a cc65 application, which then loads commands from .o65 files.
AF> 2) For what CPUs are you using the format?
65C02.
AF> 3) What special features are you using?
AF> E.g.: late binding, exported globals, simple file format,
Whatever cc65 uses :)
AF> 4) What special features are you not using?
Whatever cc65 doesn't use :)
I might move the o65 from shell.exe into the kernal, but I see no
reason for that at the moment. If I do, I'll probably use Uz'
implementation, as I do all my development with cc65.
--
___ . . . . . + . . o
_|___|_ + . + . + . Per Olofsson, arkadspelare
o-o . . . o + MagerValp@cling.gu.se
- + + . http://www.cling.gu.se/~cl3polof/
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.