From: MagerValp (MagerValp_at_panini.cling.gu.se)
Date: 2005-03-30 13:08:01
>>>>> "AF" == fachat <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: AF> If you are using o65, could you please answer these short AF> questions? Sure! I'm not sure how useful my answers are going to be though... AF> 1) What are you using o65 for? AF> E.g.: main executable format for system xyz, object file format AF> for linking, ... Executable format for a small DOS-like operating system. shell.exe is a cc65 application, which then loads commands from .o65 files. AF> 2) For what CPUs are you using the format? 65C02. AF> 3) What special features are you using? AF> E.g.: late binding, exported globals, simple file format, Whatever cc65 uses :) AF> 4) What special features are you not using? Whatever cc65 doesn't use :) I might move the o65 from shell.exe into the kernal, but I see no reason for that at the moment. If I do, I'll probably use Uz' implementation, as I do all my development with cc65. -- ___ . . . . . + . . o _|___|_ + . + . + . Per Olofsson, arkadspelare o-o . . . o + MagerValp@cling.gu.se - + + . http://www.cling.gu.se/~cl3polof/ Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.